 |
 |
 |
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, In re Parmalat Securities Litig., (March 1, 2007) MDL No. 1653-LAK (S.D. N.Y.): The court approves, as to form and content, the Notice and the Publication Notice, attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, and finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and the publication of the Publication Notice in the manner and the form set forth in Paragraph 6 of this Order . . . meet the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as emended by Section 21D(a)(7) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7), and due process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, In re Parmalat Securities Litig., (July 19, 2007) MDL No. 1653-LAK (S.D. N.Y.): The Court finds that the distribution of the Notice, the publication of the Publication Notice, and the notice methodology . . . met all applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution, (including the Due Process clause), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 78u-4, et seq.) (the “PSLRA”), the Rules of the Court, and any other applicable law.
